Holy cow, Boise State actually furloughed their coaches
Good morning, and thanks for spending part of your day with Extra Points.
Some quick housekeeping before the story for today:
Next week, the publishing schedule around here is going to change. If you’re still on the free plan, you’re going to still get two Extra Points newsletters, just like you normally would. I hope you enjoy them!
But you also have the option of financially supporting Extra Points. You can get a subscription for $7/mo, or $70 for the whole year (or, if you’re feeling SUPER generous, you can kick in a few more bucks). Paid subscribers will get two MORE newsletters, so four in total. Consider those your Extra Extra points. You can subscribe here:
Earlier, I said that I considered a subscriber base of 150 to be the baseline for financial viability. Thanks to your generous support, we’ve already hit that benchmark. That means I can a) spend more money on local news subscriptions to support other journalists and make Extra Points better, and b) can commission freelance stories.
A lot of bloggers and reporters read Extra Points, which is awesome! If any of you are interested in writing a newsletter, pitch me! I’d love to pay you for one.
In particular, I am interested in newsletters about
College football history
College athletics administrative history
Higher education finance
Any take on the intersection of economics, politics, law, religion, etc and college football
But that is by no means an exhaustive list. If you have an idea, pitch me at [email protected].
Thank you so much for your emails, your encouragement, and your prompt and significant support. I’ve cried some angry tears over these last few days, but a lot more happy ones. I will do my best not to let you down.
Now, to the big news from yesterday:
Wait, Boise State did WHAT?!?
I’ve never met Bryan Harsin, or anybody else currently on Boise State’s coaching staff, but it looks like we share something in common. We’re gonna get furloughed.
All of Boise’s coaches earn well north of $40,000, so they’re all going to be taking some unplanned, mandatory vacation, just like me. I’m sorry y’all. I’d welcome you all over to grab some beverages from my fridge and commiserate with me, but if we were allowed to visit each other’s living rooms and complain about our bosses, well, we wouldn’t need to be furloughed!
The moves will save Boise State some money, but I don’t think that’s the real story
It sucks whenever anybody has to take a paycut or have their work interrupted. But these are not three-month furloughs. For this coaching staff, we’re looking at a ten-day furlough, and all of these coaches are well-compensated individuals.
Two weeks of Harsin’s salary is $63,000. According to Dave Southern of The Athletic, Boise State will save about $165,000 from football staff furloughs. That’s real money, sure, but certainly not enough to close a significant university-wide budget hole. In an email from University President Marlene Tromp, the school claimed that mass event closures and student refunds created “ a nearly $10 million impact.”
That’s on top of budget cuts required late in 2019 by the state government. And if enrollment declines in the fall, or if additional cuts are required by the state, that impact could continue to grow.
The real story, in my opinion, is how this shifts the Overton Window in college athletics
We’ve seen plenty of coaches and administrators voluntarily accept salary cuts. I’ve even written about it here. I think coaches and administrators volunteering to make those sacrifices is a good thing!
But that isn’t a furlough. For one, coaches can’t work during a furlough. When my furlough becomes official on May 1st, I can’t use my SB Nation email, my slack, my CMS, anything that would allow me to do any actual work. While I wouldn’t be surprised if Bosie’s coaches find some ways around any potential work restrictions, you’re not supposed to work during a furlough period, and unquestionably, it will become more difficult to do so. It’s a really disruptive move. It could interrupt recruiting efforts, among other things.
It’s also, as far as I can tell, unprecedented in modern college football history. Coaches are among the highest-paid and most powerful figures on almost any campus. They have agents. They have contracts that are ten pages long. They have juice, the kind of juice that the IT administrator for the Physics department doesn’t have. You can lay off that guy, even if he makes $96,000 a year. You wouldn't do that to the football coach, and even if you wanted to, you might not be able to.
Maybe Boise’s ability to force their coaching staff to accept a furlough is a quirk of Idaho state law, I can’t say I know if every state could pull this off, legally.
But I suspect other schools would probably like to. And if Boise State, a school that might be the poster child for the benefits of a successful bootstrapped football program can pull this off, shouldn’t a school that doesn’t have quite as much political and cultural capital tied into college football be able to do it?
If Boise State can force their football coach to take unpaid days off without the world ending, couldn’t Akron? Couldn’t Ball State? Couldn’t UNLV?
Plus, and maybe I’m needlessly projecting here, I’d probably feel better if I was a professor or administrator at Boise State, and I knew that everybody had to participate in shared sacrifices, even the athletics department, and even the coaches. There’s nothing worse than feeling like your department needs to shoulder a disproportionate portion of that sacrifice.
Especially since Boise State IS a university and all, not a minor league football franchise.
Thanks for supporting Extra Points. Questions, comments, story ideas, hot takes and more can be sent to [email protected], or to @MattBrownEP on Twitter dot com.