• Extra Points
  • Posts
  • Reclassifying to FBS may become more expensive soon. Here's why:

Reclassifying to FBS may become more expensive soon. Here's why:

The D1 Council's proposed new FBS requirements, explained:

Good morning, and thanks for spending part of your day with Extra Points.

On Wednesday afternoon, the NCAA released proposed legislation from the Division I Council that would alter the current entrance requirements to reclassify from FCS to FBS.

The proposal that grabbed the most immediate headlines was a change in entrance fees. Currently, it costs $5,000 to transition from FCS to FBS. The proposed legislation bumps that number up to $5 million, all due at once.

The assumption I’ve seen from fans is that this fee increase is meant to dissuade schools from reclassifying to FBS, or to serve as some sort of gatekeeping tool. I reached out to a few ADs this week, including a few at FCS institutions that may consider reclassifying over the next few years…and most didn’t think that was really the case. Nobody I’ve spoken to believes that $5 million is enough to actually prevent anybody that was serious about reclassifying, especially since it’s a one-time expense.

Multiple industry sources told me that the $5 million mark, specifically, came from wanting to peg application fees to something resembling NCAA units. The fee to reclassify from D-II to D-I is roughly that of one NCAA Unit, and the goal, I was told, was to tie this entrance fee to roughly two NCAA Units.

ADs and other insiders told me that actually, it’s the other stuff in this proposal that matters more

Per the release:

If adopted, all FBS schools would be required to provide 90% of the total number of allowable scholarships over a two-year rolling period across at least 16 sports, including football. Schools also would be required to offer at least 210 scholarships each year, amounting to no less than $6 million in athletics scholarships offered.

Outside of FBS, most schools do not fully fund the maximum allowable scholarships for every single “Equivalency" sport, like swimming, soccer or softball. A few potential FBS candidate schools also don’t currently sponsor 16 sports, like McNeese State (14) or Montana State (15). Other schools may sponsor 16-18 sports, but not do not clear the 90% mark or the $6 million mark. I’m still trying to dig through all the data, but I suspect at least a few current FBS programs are also not in compliance with the scholarship rules. Under the proposal, schools will have until 2027 to be in compliance.

Of course, anybody moving from FCS to FBS would need to add 20+ football scholarships, plus potentially other women’s sports scholarships, so those increases may be enough to move them into compliance territory.

Adding new sports, new scholarships, or increased scholarship funding is classified as a reoccurring expense, along with all of the new staffing changes, travel, and salary adjustments that come from moving to FBS. Coupled with other expenses that are rising at the mid-major level, that could potentially give some schools pause. For what it’s worth, when I talk to mid-major FBS leaders or FCS schools that might consider a reclassification, I hear way more concerns about rising health insurance costs or finding athletic trainers than I do about scholarships….but every dollar counts.

Anybody who was seriously considering moving to FBS over the next decade is probably within shouting distance of those benchmarks, but I was repeatedly told that it’s the annual expenses that are much more significant than shelling out five million bucks to the NCAA.

FWIW, this proposal also calls for the immediate removal of attendance-related requirements that nobody follows, comprehensive reviews of athlete health support services every four years, as well as life skills and career counseling programming.

I look at these proposals (and that’s what these are, proposals that haven’t been formally voted on yet) as a continuation of the Transformation Committee’s goals to ‘elevate’ what it means to be a D-I institution, rather than the Big Bad SEC and Big Ten trying to pull up the drawbridge before Delaware and Eastern Kentucky can sneak in.

We’ll see if the proposal is meaningfully altered as it goes through the Byzantine NCAA legislative process.

We wrote a bunch of other stuff this week, in case you missed it:

The only way I can afford to pay freelancers, write thousands of words a week, make an actual computer game, file FOIAs and more, is with your support.

If you can’t swing the eight bucks, no problem. By referring friends, Twitter followers, coworkers and more to Extra Point, you can earn great rewards, like free EP subscriptions, secret-bonus-content, and more:

I’ll see y’all in your inbox next week. Thanks for reading.

This newsletter is brought to you in part by The Future Party:

The future isn’t a mystery

Want to receive the latest in business, entertainment, and internet culture right to your inbox every single morning? Not just the stuff everyone else is covering -- these are the stories that drive the future, all in a quick and witty package. That’s what TheFutureParty newsletter is all about. With every email you open, every story you read, you’re going to have the jump on the rest of the crowd. And you’ll be that much more prepared for the day -- and week, and month, and year -- ahead. Join over 100,000 driven creative professionals who read the newsletter every day.

Join the community (Extra Points earns a commission for each subscription from this link)

If you have ideas for future Extra Points newsletters or #tips you want to share, our new tips line is [email protected]. To sponsor a future Extra Points newsletter, please email [email protected]. I'm also @MattBrownEP on Twitter and @ExtraPointsMB on Instagram

Join the conversation

or to participate.